Research Ideas  

Welcome to IBD Partners Research Ideas Page!

In this area you will be able to:

  • Propose, vote on, and discuss research ideas
  • View current studies
  • View published research

Show More

You are an active participant in  IBD Partners research prioritization process! Have you ever had a question about IBD that you wish science could answer? Tell us what research is important to you!

Here, you can submit a research idea to the community, cast your votes, and discuss research ideas proposed by other members. Please make your research question as specific as possible. Other members will vote on your research idea, and we will prioritize research ideas with the most votes.

You are allowed to vote for your own proposed research idea if you want. However, you can only vote for a total of five research ideas. If you have already cast your five votes and an idea you like even more is proposed, you can change your votes at any time to reflect your current preferences.

The research team will review all submitted ideas and provide a response to you and to the community. If your idea leads to an IBD Partners Study, you will have the opportunity to serve as a patient collaborator on the research team for that study.

We encourage you to prioritize the ideas that are most important to you, even if the research team determines that your idea is not a good fit for IBD Partners. We will share ideas labeled “Not a Good Fit” with researchers outside of our network when appropriate. We want to make sure all of your votes count!

Thanks for your participation in this important platform to help the IBD research community understand what research questions are important to patients. We are passionate about finding answers to your questions!

Published Studies

Year Publication Categories
Trends and Characteristics of Clinical Trials Participation for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States: A Report From IBD Partners


Between 2011 and 2018, participation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for inflammatory bowel disease declined while available RCTs in-creased. Younger patients, patients in community settings, and patients with milder disease were underrepresented in RCTs. Nonparticipants had disease activity failing remission criteria, highlighting the role of RCT participation.

Full Scientific Manuscript

Clinical; Trials; older; academic; medical center; severe; disease; sicker; vedolizumab; ustekinumab; tofacitinib; under; age; community; facilities; underrepresented; newest; therapies; free; medication; procedures; all patients have; opportunity

Research Methods, Alternative Therapies, Medications
Variation in Care of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Patients in CCFA Partners: Role of Gastroenterologist Practice Setting in Disease Outcomes and Quality Process Measures


Variation in care of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) has been used as a marker for quality differences. We studied whether important aspects of IBD patients’ care in CCFA Partners varied based on where their GI doctor was in practice. We compared patients who saw an academic (university) GI physician, a private practice GI physician, or other GI physician (such as a Veteran’s Affairs physician). The study included about 12,000 IBD patients. Almost 95% reported visiting a GI provider at least once a year: about 74% saw a private practice physician, 15% academic, and 11% other. Those patients with CD seen by academic physicians were younger, has completed higher education, used less mesalamine medications, and used more biologics and immunomodulators. They were more likely to be in remission, were more likely to get a flu shot, smoked less, and were less likely to be on steroids when compared to private or other physicians. Patients with UC seen by academic providers were younger, had more hospitalizations and surgery, with greater biologic and immunomodulator use. There was no difference in steroid use, and no differences in any of the other measures like remission rates, flu shot, quality of life. In summary, there was much more variation in CD care as compared to UC care, with improved outcomes for CD patients seen by academic providers. Studying why this is the case, could help us to improve the quality of care delivered to all IBD patients.

Full Scientific Manuscript

healthcare setting; quality of care; remission; gastroenterologist; quality of life; QOL; medications; Crohn’s disease; Crohn’s; CD; ulcerative colitis; UC; colitis

Health Maintenance, Environment, Medications
Achieving Synergy: Linking an Internet-Based Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort to a Community-Based Inception Cohort and Multicentered Cohort in Inflammatory Bowel Disease


Cohort studies follow groups of people to understand disease. They are difficult to organize and often do not focus on patient-reported outcomes. Internet-based cohort studies provide new opportunities to study patient-reported outcomes; they are also efficient and can easily include large numbers of people. Linking an Internet-based cohort study, like CCFA-Partners, to a traditional cohort study can be beneficial to both studies and add a tremendous amount of information about a disease. Therefore, we aimed to link CCFA-Partners with the Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry (OSCCAR) and The Sinai-Helmsley Alliance for Research Excellence (SHARE), both of which are traditional cohort studies. OSCCAR is a cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Rhode Island. SHARE is a cohort across 7 academic medical centers around the United States. Both cohorts collect specimens, like blood and stool, from participants. OSCCAR enrolled people with IBD from 2008 to 2013. SHARE started enrolling people with IBD in July 2012 and enrollment is continuing. People in the cohorts who had access to the Internet were told about CCFA-Partners by the study coordinators and encouraged to enroll.

In the OSCCAR cohort, 243 of the 320 participants consented to join the CCFA-Partners cohort. However, only 44 participants completed enrollment in CCFA-Partners. OSCCAR participants who completed enrollment were better educated than those who did not complete enrollment. In the SHARE cohort, 436 participants completed enrolment in CCFA-Partners. SHARE participants who completed enrollment were more often women and white. If they had Crohn’s disease, those who completed enrollment had fewer disease symptoms and if they had ulcerative colitis, those who completed enrollment had less extensive disease. Linkage of CCFA Partners with cohorts such as OSCCAR and SHARE may be a cost-effective way to expand opportunities for research. Although linkage is possible, participant’s willingness to complete the linkage is the limiting factor. Asking participants in a traditional cohort at the time of enrollment may be a way of maximizing linkage to CCFA-Partners.

Full Published Manuscript

cohort; Crohn's Disease; Crohn's; CD; population; patient-reported outcomes; symptoms; physical health; social health; psychosocial health

Research Methods, Study Updates, Health Maintenance

Active Studies VIEW ALL
Your search did not match any active studies.